Less than 30 days until we go to the polls to vote for Mayor of the District of Columbia. Who's your choice, Cropp or Fenty, and why?
DC's Black Voices
Welcome to the District of Columbia's home for spirited political, social and economic dialogue. This blog will publish my view of the African American community in our Nation's Capital. On this site, no subject pertaining to our community is off limits; i.e., race relations, religion, education, health care, housing, economic development, local and federal politics, sex or sports. This is our opportunity to share Our story, Our thoughts and Our feelings.
About Me
- Name: Leo Alexander
- Location: Washington, D.C., United States
I love my faith, family and struggle to still believe in my country.
Tuesday, August 15, 2006
DC's Black Voices
Less than 30 days until we go to the polls to vote for Mayor of the District of Columbia. Who's your choice, Cropp or Fenty, and why?
Less than 30 days until we go to the polls to vote for Mayor of the District of Columbia. Who's your choice, Cropp or Fenty, and why?
Friday, February 10, 2006
DC's Black Voices
Next meeting for the CNCMC
Monday, Feb. 20th @ 6:30 p.m. at 3939 Benning Rd. NE. This meeting is a strategy session for supporters of the National Capital Medical Center only.
Next meeting for the CNCMC
Monday, Feb. 20th @ 6:30 p.m. at 3939 Benning Rd. NE. This meeting is a strategy session for supporters of the National Capital Medical Center only.
Thursday, February 02, 2006
DC's Black Voices Public Enemy #1
Now that I have been labeled in the February 1, 2006 edition of DCWatch as, “the ugliest, nastiest and most offensive” writer this blog has ever published, I’m not going to waste space attempting to defend my position as it relates to that ‘lost soul’ I took to task in my last posting. But I will share a little bit of who I am and why I feel the way I do about this community.
After 10 years as a television news journalist, and facing what would have been my third move in five years, I decided I had had enough. I really wanted to establish some roots in the District—so I stayed. I worked in New Orleans before coming to DC in 1995. The two cities are very similar; both depend heavily on the tourism industry, both have problems with the public school system, both struggle with an almost daily increasing murder count, and they also have a black majority of colorful people. However, the glaring differences is that DC is a government town and the home to the most educated population of African Americans you’ll find anywhere in the world. I’m proud of the latter fact, but I’m also a little disappointed; because the few that have made it have consciously allowed themselves to be silenced. When I was in the news business, I was only allowed to say so much. Every word was scripted and subject to being censored and edited. That is the TV news business. But now that I’m self-employed, I can freely share some of my observations.
After you scrape away all the rhetoric, blind yourself to race and sexual orientation, and get down to the real issues, the people who call DC home are all basically the same. We want safe, clean and healthy communities. We want our children to get a quality education and have the options that that will offer. We want to work and own property. And we expect our government to do the right thing. Essentially, we all recognize the need for an equal distribution of this city’s resources; i.e., jobs, health care, vocational education and affordable housing.
This brings me to the debate on the National Capital Medical Center. First of all, the quality of healthcare dispensed from DC General Hospital, the nine community health centers and Public School Nurse Program of the Public Benefit Corporation was never an issue. The problems were in management, billing, collections and facilities. The place was hemorrhaging money, and instead of addressing those four areas, the Mayor and the Financial Control Board’s solution was to shut it down. This was the ill-fated process used to close DC General Hospital. First, administrators of the hospital were responsible for the submission of a detailed closure plan that addressed the needs of patients that were currently admitted, and patients that accessed that facility for services in the past. Second, the Department of Health (DOH) approved the plan and coordinated the process; which included, DOH advising the community by facilitated public hearings, providing resource information and ensuring provisions were made for the safekeeping, storage and accessibility of patient medical records. Sensing a potential political powder keg, District officials answered the expressed concerns regarding the desertion of a community by saying that systems would be put in place to ensure residents had access to the same level of care and services. DOH was charged with developing a health care access program for uninsured and uninsurable residents of the District with incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty level and inmates of the DC Jail. The DC HealthCare Alliance was put in place to fill the void that was left once the hospital’s doors closed to inpatient care. Greater Southeast was awarded a 5-year contract to manage the Alliance program, and as such, the institution was to establish itself as a Level 1 trauma center. This never happened. Greater SE was also charged with establishing a Satellite Emergency Department (SED) at the DC General site. It was supposed to house one or two EMS vehicles so transportation would be readily available to patients accessing the SED in need of a higher-level of care. This was poorly implemented and eventually phased out.
The parent company of Greater SE was also plagued with financial difficulties. The parent company was using the Alliance money to jet set and run its other healthcare operations around the country. DOH sources say it never invested in the physical plant at Greater SE, DC General or the community clinics. In combination with these issues, and the facility holding area’s inability to pass the Fire Department’s inspection, the contract was cancelled and turned over to DOH. Now there it is, the District simply never delivered on its promise to the citizens in the eastern sector of our community.
I hope this answers some of your questions and makes the argument as it pertains to need.
Now that I have been labeled in the February 1, 2006 edition of DCWatch as, “the ugliest, nastiest and most offensive” writer this blog has ever published, I’m not going to waste space attempting to defend my position as it relates to that ‘lost soul’ I took to task in my last posting. But I will share a little bit of who I am and why I feel the way I do about this community.
After 10 years as a television news journalist, and facing what would have been my third move in five years, I decided I had had enough. I really wanted to establish some roots in the District—so I stayed. I worked in New Orleans before coming to DC in 1995. The two cities are very similar; both depend heavily on the tourism industry, both have problems with the public school system, both struggle with an almost daily increasing murder count, and they also have a black majority of colorful people. However, the glaring differences is that DC is a government town and the home to the most educated population of African Americans you’ll find anywhere in the world. I’m proud of the latter fact, but I’m also a little disappointed; because the few that have made it have consciously allowed themselves to be silenced. When I was in the news business, I was only allowed to say so much. Every word was scripted and subject to being censored and edited. That is the TV news business. But now that I’m self-employed, I can freely share some of my observations.
After you scrape away all the rhetoric, blind yourself to race and sexual orientation, and get down to the real issues, the people who call DC home are all basically the same. We want safe, clean and healthy communities. We want our children to get a quality education and have the options that that will offer. We want to work and own property. And we expect our government to do the right thing. Essentially, we all recognize the need for an equal distribution of this city’s resources; i.e., jobs, health care, vocational education and affordable housing.
This brings me to the debate on the National Capital Medical Center. First of all, the quality of healthcare dispensed from DC General Hospital, the nine community health centers and Public School Nurse Program of the Public Benefit Corporation was never an issue. The problems were in management, billing, collections and facilities. The place was hemorrhaging money, and instead of addressing those four areas, the Mayor and the Financial Control Board’s solution was to shut it down. This was the ill-fated process used to close DC General Hospital. First, administrators of the hospital were responsible for the submission of a detailed closure plan that addressed the needs of patients that were currently admitted, and patients that accessed that facility for services in the past. Second, the Department of Health (DOH) approved the plan and coordinated the process; which included, DOH advising the community by facilitated public hearings, providing resource information and ensuring provisions were made for the safekeeping, storage and accessibility of patient medical records. Sensing a potential political powder keg, District officials answered the expressed concerns regarding the desertion of a community by saying that systems would be put in place to ensure residents had access to the same level of care and services. DOH was charged with developing a health care access program for uninsured and uninsurable residents of the District with incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty level and inmates of the DC Jail. The DC HealthCare Alliance was put in place to fill the void that was left once the hospital’s doors closed to inpatient care. Greater Southeast was awarded a 5-year contract to manage the Alliance program, and as such, the institution was to establish itself as a Level 1 trauma center. This never happened. Greater SE was also charged with establishing a Satellite Emergency Department (SED) at the DC General site. It was supposed to house one or two EMS vehicles so transportation would be readily available to patients accessing the SED in need of a higher-level of care. This was poorly implemented and eventually phased out.
The parent company of Greater SE was also plagued with financial difficulties. The parent company was using the Alliance money to jet set and run its other healthcare operations around the country. DOH sources say it never invested in the physical plant at Greater SE, DC General or the community clinics. In combination with these issues, and the facility holding area’s inability to pass the Fire Department’s inspection, the contract was cancelled and turned over to DOH. Now there it is, the District simply never delivered on its promise to the citizens in the eastern sector of our community.
I hope this answers some of your questions and makes the argument as it pertains to need.
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
DC's Black Voices
Why don't they put the NCMC over there?
This question has come up several times during this debate. The more enlightened members of the community agree with the CNCMC that a Level 1 trauma center is needed, but ask, "Why not put it in wards 7 or 8?"
I've gotten two answers to that question:
1. There is no city owned land in those two wards large enough to adequately handle the size and traffic flow created by a Level 1 trauma center.
2. Reservation 13, the DC General site, is the only obvious location for this proposed state-of-the-art facility.
What do you think?
Why don't they put the NCMC over there?
This question has come up several times during this debate. The more enlightened members of the community agree with the CNCMC that a Level 1 trauma center is needed, but ask, "Why not put it in wards 7 or 8?"
I've gotten two answers to that question:
1. There is no city owned land in those two wards large enough to adequately handle the size and traffic flow created by a Level 1 trauma center.
2. Reservation 13, the DC General site, is the only obvious location for this proposed state-of-the-art facility.
What do you think?
Sunday, January 29, 2006
DC's Black Voices
The Big "O" got got!
Late last year, Oprah endorsed a book called 'A Million Little Pieces.' In it, the author told his personal story of drug addiction. The problem was most of the book was lies -- total bullshit. Last week, Oprah finally had to deal with this deception and confronted the author on her show. The show was watched by 9.5 million Americans. It was must see T.V. in its truest form. Unfortunately, it was too little too late because 3.5 million books had already been sold; after the show the sales of the book pushed it back into the top five.
In the end, the author is now rich and Oprah is still famous -- so who loses?
The Big "O" got got!
Late last year, Oprah endorsed a book called 'A Million Little Pieces.' In it, the author told his personal story of drug addiction. The problem was most of the book was lies -- total bullshit. Last week, Oprah finally had to deal with this deception and confronted the author on her show. The show was watched by 9.5 million Americans. It was must see T.V. in its truest form. Unfortunately, it was too little too late because 3.5 million books had already been sold; after the show the sales of the book pushed it back into the top five.
In the end, the author is now rich and Oprah is still famous -- so who loses?
Thursday, January 26, 2006
DC's Black Voices
The Certificate of Need--what's the deal?
Opponents of the National Capital Medical Center are calling for the Certificate of Need process to block the initiative from happening.
Should the supporters of the NCMC be concerned about this strategy?
The CON process in the District is in place to ensure that services (hospital, stand alone outpatient, equipment and additional beds) are not duplicated in the same vicinity. Along the same lines, it ensures that new providers are not moving into an established providers backyard or trying to monopolize a service.
In some states the CON process is also done on the back end, if a hospital decides to close. This is to ensure that communities/patients aren't left without other health care options. Mind you, this didn't happen in the case of DC General.
Not every state requires the CON process. As a matter of fact, recently DC didn't use the process for 13 years. The opponents of the NCMC can legally tie up this initiative in the CON process for 5 years. This move would increase the cost commitment for the District exponentially and continue to leave a sector of the community without immediate access to a Level 1 trauma center.
So the question is can the Council members really support the NCMC and at the same time vote for the CON?
Or is this just a move to straddle the political fence on this issue?
The Certificate of Need--what's the deal?
Opponents of the National Capital Medical Center are calling for the Certificate of Need process to block the initiative from happening.
Should the supporters of the NCMC be concerned about this strategy?
The CON process in the District is in place to ensure that services (hospital, stand alone outpatient, equipment and additional beds) are not duplicated in the same vicinity. Along the same lines, it ensures that new providers are not moving into an established providers backyard or trying to monopolize a service.
In some states the CON process is also done on the back end, if a hospital decides to close. This is to ensure that communities/patients aren't left without other health care options. Mind you, this didn't happen in the case of DC General.
Not every state requires the CON process. As a matter of fact, recently DC didn't use the process for 13 years. The opponents of the NCMC can legally tie up this initiative in the CON process for 5 years. This move would increase the cost commitment for the District exponentially and continue to leave a sector of the community without immediate access to a Level 1 trauma center.
So the question is can the Council members really support the NCMC and at the same time vote for the CON?
Or is this just a move to straddle the political fence on this issue?
